The intersection of the previous president’s insurance policies, statements, and actions with the pursuits and considerations of indigenous populations in the USA is a fancy and multifaceted concern. It encompasses a spread of areas, together with tribal sovereignty, environmental rules, financial growth, and cultural preservation. For instance, choices concerning land use, useful resource extraction, and federal recognition of tribes have had vital impacts.
Understanding this relationship is essential for assessing the broader affect of governmental insurance policies on marginalized communities. Traditionally, the connection between the U.S. authorities and Native American tribes has been fraught with battle and damaged treaties. Subsequently, modern interactions have to be seen inside this historic context to know the nuances and complexities concerned. Consideration of this dynamic highlights the continuing challenges confronted by indigenous communities and the significance of respecting tribal sovereignty.
Subsequent sections will delve into particular coverage choices and their ramifications, exploring the views of tribal leaders and group members, and analyzing the general impact on indigenous communities throughout his time in workplace. These explorations intention to offer an in depth and goal overview of this necessary topic.
1. Tribal Sovereignty
Tribal sovereignty, the inherent authority of indigenous tribes to manipulate themselves and their lands, represents a cornerstone of the connection between the U.S. authorities and Native American nations. Examination of governmental interactions with these tribes reveals impacts on this sovereignty, affecting self-determination and the power to keep up cultural and financial autonomy.
-
Self-Governance Agreements
These agreements permit tribes to imagine higher management over federal packages and funding, immediately impacting their capability to handle assets and ship companies. Choices impacting the negotiation and implementation of those agreements have an effect on the scope and effectiveness of tribal self-governance, influencing their capacity to deal with native wants and priorities.
-
Jurisdictional Authority
Defining the extent of tribal jurisdictional authority over lands and members is essential for sustaining order and administering justice inside tribal communities. Disputes over prison and civil jurisdiction, significantly on reservations with advanced land possession patterns, spotlight the continuing challenges in asserting tribal sovereignty. Choices influencing these jurisdictional boundaries have profound implications for tribal legislation enforcement and judicial techniques.
-
Pure Useful resource Administration
Tribes typically possess treaty rights to pure assets, together with water, minerals, and timber. Governmental choices concerning useful resource extraction, environmental rules, and infrastructure growth can both assist or undermine tribal management over these assets. Safety of treaty rights and session with tribes on tasks affecting their assets are very important for upholding sovereignty on this area.
-
Regulatory Authority
Tribes possess the authority to enact and implement legal guidelines and rules inside their jurisdictions, together with these associated to environmental safety, gaming, and taxation. Choices impacting the scope of tribal regulatory authority immediately have an effect on their capacity to guard their surroundings, handle financial actions, and generate income for important companies. Respect for tribal regulatory powers is essential for fostering self-sufficiency and sustainable growth.
The interplay between the chief department and tribal nations, due to this fact, has vital repercussions for the train of tribal sovereignty throughout varied domains. The administration’s strategy to self-governance agreements, jurisdictional disputes, useful resource administration, and regulatory authority displays its broader stance on tribal self-determination and its dedication to upholding treaty obligations.
2. Dakota Entry Pipeline
The Dakota Entry Pipeline (DAPL) controversy represents a big level of rivalry throughout the broader context of interactions between the previous president and Native American tribes. The pipeline venture, designed to move crude oil throughout a number of states, gained notoriety resulting from its deliberate route traversing land close to the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. This proximity raised considerations about potential environmental injury to the tribe’s water provide and disruption of sacred websites. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, together with different indigenous teams and environmental activists, mounted sustained protests in opposition to the pipeline’s building.
The change in administrations influenced the DAPL state of affairs. The earlier administration had halted the venture for environmental evaluate. The incoming administration expedited the pipeline’s completion, successfully reversing prior choices. This motion underscored a divergence in coverage approaches in the direction of power infrastructure growth and tribal session. Authorized challenges introduced by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe continued, specializing in the adequacy of environmental affect assessments and the federal government’s success of treaty obligations. The pipeline grew to become operational amidst ongoing authorized battles, demonstrating the advanced interaction between govt choices, judicial evaluate, and tribal sovereignty.
The DAPL controversy illustrates the challenges confronted by Native American tribes in defending their treaty rights and environmental assets. It highlights the significance of significant session with tribes on tasks which will affect their lands, water, and cultural heritage. The authorized and political ramifications of the DAPL proceed to resonate, serving as a case examine for understanding the complexities of balancing power growth with tribal sovereignty and environmental safety.
3. Environmental Rules
Environmental rules play a pivotal function within the relationship between the U.S. authorities and Native American tribes, significantly regarding land use, useful resource administration, and the safety of culturally vital websites. Actions impacting these rules have direct penalties for tribal sovereignty, financial growth, and public well being inside Native American communities. For instance, choices concerning the enforcement of the Clear Water Act or the Endangered Species Act on tribal lands affect tribal entry to wash water and the preservation of conventional looking and fishing grounds. Weakening or altering these rules can disproportionately have an effect on tribes, who typically depend on pure assets for sustenance and cultural practices.
The strategy to environmental oversight on Native American lands grew to become a focus. Particular situations embody choices associated to mining permits, oil and fuel leases, and infrastructure tasks. Easing restrictions on useful resource extraction, whereas doubtlessly stimulating financial exercise, raised considerations about environmental degradation and the potential violation of treaty rights. The session course of with tribal nations concerning environmental assessments and venture approvals grew to become a essential measure of the federal government’s dedication to respecting tribal sovereignty and defending indigenous pursuits. The sensible utility of those insurance policies manifested in particular tasks and their measurable impacts on tribal lands and assets.
In abstract, the administration’s stance on environmental rules considerably influenced its relationship with Native American tribes. The balancing act between financial growth and environmental safety, in addition to the diploma of tribal session in decision-making processes, formed the general affect on indigenous communities. The outcomes spotlight the continuing pressure between federal insurance policies and the inherent rights of Native American nations, emphasizing the necessity for a nuanced and respectful strategy to environmental stewardship.
4. Gaming Rights
Gaming rights symbolize a big facet of tribal sovereignty and financial growth for a lot of Native American tribes. The connection between the chief department and Native American gaming pursuits includes advanced authorized, financial, and political issues. Analyzing this relationship offers insights into the administration’s strategy to tribal self-determination and financial autonomy.
-
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA)
IGRA offers the framework for the regulation of Native American gaming. It establishes the respective roles of the federal authorities, state governments, and tribal governments in overseeing gaming operations. Choices concerning the interpretation and enforcement of IGRA immediately affect the power of tribes to function and regulate gaming amenities. Any actions that have an effect on IGRA have far-reaching penalties for tribal income and financial self-sufficiency.
-
Tribal-State Compacts
IGRA requires tribes to barter compacts with state governments to conduct Class III gaming, which incorporates most casino-style video games. The negotiation of those compacts typically includes contentious points reminiscent of income sharing, regulatory oversight, and the scope of permissible gaming actions. Federal involvement in these negotiations can both facilitate or impede the power of tribes to safe favorable phrases, affecting their income streams and financial growth prospects.
-
Federal Recognition and Gaming Eligibility
Federal recognition confers sure rights and privileges upon tribes, together with the proper to interact in gaming actions below IGRA. Choices concerning federal recognition purposes can due to this fact have a big affect on a tribe’s capacity to pursue gaming as a income. Challenges to current tribal recognition standing can even jeopardize gaming operations and financial stability. Subsequently, the chief department’s strategy to federal recognition has a direct bearing on tribal gaming pursuits.
-
Enforcement and Oversight
The federal authorities, via companies such because the Nationwide Indian Gaming Fee (NIGC), performs a task in overseeing compliance with IGRA and making certain the integrity of tribal gaming operations. The extent of enforcement exercise and the rigor of regulatory oversight can affect the competitiveness and profitability of tribal gaming enterprises. Choices concerning the funding and staffing of regulatory companies immediately have an effect on their capacity to meet their oversight obligations.
The interplay between the chief department and Native American gaming pursuits displays a fancy balancing act between selling tribal self-determination, making certain regulatory compliance, and addressing state pursuits. The outcomes of those interactions have vital implications for tribal economies, authorities revenues, and the general relationship between the federal authorities and Native American nations. These examples replicate necessary features of the connection and are essential to understanding the broader implications.
5. Land Rights
Land rights are a central concern within the relationship between the U.S. authorities and Native American tribes, traditionally and in modern coverage. These rights, typically stemming from treaties, govt orders, and federal statutes, outline the extent to which tribes can management and make the most of their ancestral lands. Insurance policies and actions regarding these rights had vital implications.
-
Belief Land Administration
The federal authorities holds land in belief for a lot of Native American tribes, managing these lands on their behalf. Choices concerning useful resource growth, leasing, and land gross sales on belief lands immediately affect tribal economies and cultural preservation efforts. Approvals for pipelines, mining operations, or business growth tasks on belief lands have been factors of rivalry, elevating considerations about environmental safety and tribal session.
-
Land Consolidation and Acquisition
Fractionated land possession, ensuing from the Dawes Act, continues to pose challenges for a lot of tribes. Insurance policies geared toward consolidating land possession or facilitating tribal acquisition of land may also help to revive tribal land bases and promote financial growth. Choices concerning funding for land consolidation packages or the switch of federal lands to tribal possession had a tangible affect on tribal land holdings and financial alternatives.
-
Safety of Sacred Websites
Many Native American tribes have ancestral and sacred websites situated on federal lands exterior of reservation boundaries. Safety of those websites from growth or desecration is a matter of cultural and spiritual significance. Choices concerning the administration of federal lands, together with the approval of mining permits or infrastructure tasks, can both shield or threaten these sacred websites, impacting tribal cultural practices and spiritual freedom. Session with tribes concerning the administration of federal lands is crucial for making certain the safety of sacred websites.
-
Boundary Disputes and Treaty Rights
Boundary disputes and treaty rights associated to land proceed to be sources of battle between tribes and the federal authorities, in addition to state and native governments. Disputes over looking and fishing rights, water rights, and entry to conventional territories require authorized interpretation and negotiation. The federal authorities’s place on these disputes had vital implications for tribal self-determination and useful resource administration.
The administration’s strategy to land rights immediately influenced its relationship with Native American tribes. The extent to which tribal considerations have been thought of in land administration choices, the assist offered for land consolidation efforts, and the safety afforded to sacred websites have been all indicators of the administration’s dedication to upholding treaty obligations and respecting tribal sovereignty. These points replicate the continuing significance of land rights within the relationship between the U.S. authorities and Native American nations.
6. Federal Recognition
Federal recognition, a course of by which the U.S. authorities acknowledges a Native American tribe’s existence and sovereignty, is a essential element within the relationship between the chief department and indigenous populations. Actions regarding federal recognition through the said time interval immediately impacted the rights, assets, and self-determination of affected tribes. The choice to grant or deny recognition influences a tribe’s eligibility for federal funding, healthcare companies, and safety of cultural assets. The sensible impact of those choices shapes the trajectory of tribal governance and financial growth.
Take into account the case of tribes actively looking for recognition or whose recognition standing was below evaluate. The method entails rigorous documentation of historic continuity, group id, and political authority. Choices made through the evaluate course of replicate the chief department’s interpretation of established standards and authorized precedents. Any alterations to the method, or shifts within the standards used to evaluate tribal standing, have long-lasting penalties. The Mashpee Wampanoag tribe, for instance, confronted challenges to its land rights following a reversal of its recognition standing, highlighting the tangible implications of those determinations.
In conclusion, the chief department’s strategy to federal recognition instances had far-reaching results on Native American communities. The integrity and transparency of the popularity course of stay essential for making certain equity and fairness. The results of recognition choices lengthen past authorized and monetary issues, affecting the cultural survival and self-determination of Native American tribes for generations. The interplay between the chief and tribal nations underscores the fragile stability between governmental authority and indigenous sovereignty.
7. Financial Growth
Financial growth inside Native American communities presents a multifaceted panorama, considerably influenced by federal insurance policies and presidential administrations. Examination of actions referring to financial initiatives through the said time interval reveals their potential impacts on tribal self-sufficiency and prosperity.
-
Alternative Zones
The Alternative Zones program, designed to spur funding in economically distressed areas, included some tribal lands. The effectiveness of this program in fostering sustainable financial progress inside these communities stays a topic of study. Components reminiscent of infrastructure limitations, entry to capital, and the alignment of funding priorities with tribal wants play essential roles in figuring out this system’s success.
-
Power Growth
Insurance policies encouraging power growth, together with fossil fuels, on tribal lands had implications for tribal economies and environmental stewardship. Whereas elevated power manufacturing can generate income and employment alternatives, considerations arose concerning potential environmental impacts and the preservation of cultural assets. Balancing financial advantages with environmental sustainability is a key problem in power growth on tribal lands.
-
Small Enterprise Help
Help for Native American-owned small companies can foster entrepreneurship and create jobs inside tribal communities. Entry to capital, technical help, and contracting alternatives are important for the success of those companies. Insurance policies geared toward selling Native American entrepreneurship, reminiscent of set-aside packages and mortgage ensures, can contribute to financial diversification and self-sufficiency.
-
Infrastructure Funding
Funding in infrastructure, together with roads, broadband, and water techniques, is essential for supporting financial growth on tribal lands. Improved infrastructure can facilitate enterprise progress, improve entry to schooling and healthcare, and enhance the general high quality of life for tribal members. Federal funding for infrastructure tasks on tribal lands is crucial for addressing longstanding disparities and selling financial alternative.
These sides spotlight the complexities of fostering financial growth inside Native American communities. The alignment of federal insurance policies with tribal priorities, the balancing of financial advantages with environmental considerations, and the promotion of tribal self-determination are key issues in shaping the financial way forward for Native American nations. Particular examples additional spotlight the complexities of the subject.
8. Healthcare Entry
Healthcare entry inside Native American communities represents a persistent problem, exacerbated by historic inequities, geographic isolation, and socioeconomic disparities. Examination of federal insurance policies and actions regarding healthcare supply through the related interval reveals their affect on these susceptible populations. Any adjustments to healthcare funding, program eligibility, or service supply fashions had direct penalties for the well being and well-being of Native Individuals.
-
Indian Well being Service (IHS) Funding
The Indian Well being Service, accountable for offering healthcare to roughly 2.6 million Native Individuals, operates on a funds topic to congressional appropriations. Fluctuations in IHS funding immediately affect the provision of medical companies, staffing ranges at IHS amenities, and the power to deal with continual well being situations prevalent inside Native American communities. Shortfalls in funding can result in rationing of care, longer wait instances, and decreased entry to specialised medical companies.
-
Inexpensive Care Act (ACA) and Tribal Provisions
The Inexpensive Care Act included provisions geared toward enhancing healthcare entry for Native Individuals, reminiscent of increasing Medicaid eligibility and offering funding for tribal healthcare packages. Any efforts to repeal or weaken the ACA had the potential to disproportionately have an effect on Native Individuals, jeopardizing their entry to inexpensive medical health insurance and important healthcare companies. The affect of those legislative adjustments required cautious monitoring to evaluate their impact on tribal healthcare techniques.
-
Telehealth Enlargement
Telehealth, the supply of healthcare companies remotely utilizing know-how, holds promise for enhancing entry to care in geographically remoted Native American communities. Insurance policies selling or hindering the growth of telehealth infrastructure and reimbursement for telehealth companies immediately affect the power of Native Individuals to obtain well timed medical care. Funding in broadband connectivity and coaching for healthcare suppliers are important for realizing the total potential of telehealth in tribal areas.
-
Psychological Well being Providers
Psychological well being problems, together with substance abuse and suicide, pose vital challenges inside Native American communities. Entry to culturally competent psychological well being companies is essential for addressing these points. Insurance policies affecting funding for psychological well being packages, coaching for psychological well being professionals, and the combination of psychological well being companies into major care settings immediately affect the provision and high quality of psychological healthcare for Native Individuals. Recognition of conventional therapeutic practices and collaboration with tribal healers are important elements of efficient psychological well being interventions.
In abstract, governmental choices concerning healthcare entry immediately affected the well being and well-being of Native Individuals. The adequacy of IHS funding, the implementation of ACA provisions, the growth of telehealth companies, and the provision of psychological well being assets have been all indicators of the administration’s dedication to addressing healthcare disparities in tribal communities. The interplay between federal insurance policies and tribal healthcare techniques highlights the continuing want for collaboration, cultural sensitivity, and sustained funding to make sure equitable healthcare entry for all Native Individuals.
9. Cultural Preservation
Cultural preservation, the energetic upkeep and safety of cultural heritage, stands as a essential concern for Native American tribes. Federal insurance policies and govt actions affect the power of those communities to safeguard their languages, traditions, sacred websites, and cultural assets. Understanding the interplay between the previous president and indigenous cultural preservation efforts requires analyzing particular insurance policies and their penalties.
-
Safety of Sacred Websites
Sacred websites, areas of spiritual or cultural significance to Native American tribes, are sometimes threatened by growth, useful resource extraction, or vandalism. Federal legal guidelines, such because the Nationwide Historic Preservation Act and the Native American Graves Safety and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), present some safety for these websites. Nevertheless, the enforcement of those legal guidelines and the willingness of federal companies to seek the advice of with tribes on tasks which will affect sacred websites assorted. The battle surrounding the Dakota Entry Pipeline, which traversed land close to the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation, serves as a outstanding instance of the challenges in balancing infrastructure growth with the safety of tribal cultural heritage. Choices made through the related time interval had penalties for quite a few sacred websites throughout the nation.
-
Language Preservation Packages
Native American languages, integral to cultural id and conventional information, face a excessive threat of extinction. Federal funding for language revitalization packages, such because the Esther Martinez Native American Languages Preservation Act grants, helps tribal efforts to show and protect their languages. Insurance policies impacting funding ranges or the scope of those packages immediately affected tribal language preservation initiatives. The provision of assets for language schooling, curriculum growth, and trainer coaching influenced the success of those packages.
-
Repatriation of Cultural Gadgets
NAGPRA mandates the repatriation of Native American human stays and cultural gadgets held by federal companies and museums. Compliance with NAGPRA and the well timed return of these things to their rightful tribal homeowners is crucial for therapeutic historic wounds and reaffirming tribal sovereignty. The extent of enforcement of NAGPRA, the willingness of establishments to cooperate with tribes, and the provision of funding for repatriation efforts immediately influenced the tempo and effectiveness of repatriation. Disputes over the cultural affiliation of sure gadgets and the correct dealing with of human stays continued to pose challenges throughout this era.
-
Arts and Cultural Expression
Native American arts and cultural expression play an important function in sustaining cultural traditions and selling cultural understanding. Federal assist for Native American artists, cultural facilities, and museums helps to foster creativity, protect conventional artwork types, and educate the general public about Native American cultures. Insurance policies affecting funding for these initiatives, in addition to mental property rights safety for Native American artists, influenced the vitality and visibility of Native American arts and tradition. The promotion of Native American tourism and cultural heritage tourism additionally contributed to financial growth and cultural preservation.
These elements symbolize the intricate relationship between governmental motion and cultural preservation inside Native American communities. The administration’s stance on sacred websites, language packages, repatriation, and assist for the humanities formed the panorama of cultural preservation efforts and affected the power of tribes to keep up their distinctive identities for future generations. These areas showcase how governmental insurance policies had far-reaching impacts on the cultural well-being of tribal nations.
Continuously Requested Questions
The next addresses frequent questions and misconceptions concerning the intersection of insurance policies, statements, and actions of the previous president with the pursuits of Native American tribes. The intention is to offer factual data and context to reinforce understanding of this advanced relationship.
Query 1: What was the final tone of the connection between the administration and Native American tribes?
The connection was typically characterised by pressure and controversy, stemming from disagreements over points reminiscent of environmental rules, land rights, and tribal sovereignty. Whereas some tribes discovered frequent floor with the administration on particular points, many others expressed considerations about insurance policies that they believed undermined their pursuits.
Query 2: What particular insurance policies generated essentially the most controversy?
The Dakota Entry Pipeline, adjustments to environmental rules, and alterations to the method of federal recognition for tribes generated vital controversy. These actions raised considerations about treaty rights, environmental safety, and tribal self-determination.
Query 3: How did the administration strategy tribal sovereignty?
The strategy to tribal sovereignty was seen with skepticism by many tribal leaders, who argued that sure insurance policies and actions undermined tribal self-governance and treaty rights. Particular situations, reminiscent of disputes over land use and useful resource administration, highlighted the complexities of this relationship.
Query 4: What have been the principle considerations concerning environmental rules?
The first considerations revolved across the potential for environmental injury to tribal lands and assets resulting from relaxed rules on useful resource extraction and infrastructure growth. Tribes expressed considerations concerning the potential impacts on water high quality, sacred websites, and conventional looking and fishing grounds.
Query 5: What affect did the administration’s insurance policies have on Native American healthcare entry?
Adjustments to the Inexpensive Care Act and funding ranges for the Indian Well being Service generated considerations concerning the potential for decreased healthcare entry for Native Individuals. These considerations centered on the provision of inexpensive medical health insurance, entry to specialised medical companies, and the power of tribal healthcare techniques to satisfy the wants of their communities.
Query 6: Did any Native American tribes assist the administration’s insurance policies?
Whereas many tribes opposed sure insurance policies, some discovered frequent floor with the administration on points reminiscent of financial growth or power manufacturing. These situations typically concerned particular tasks or initiatives that aligned with tribal financial pursuits.
In abstract, the connection between the administration and Native American tribes was advanced and multifaceted, characterised by each battle and cooperation. Understanding the particular points and insurance policies concerned is crucial for gaining a complete perspective on this necessary dynamic.
The subsequent part will provide assets for additional analysis and knowledge on this matter.
Analyzing the Insurance policies Regarding Native Individuals
This part affords steering for an intensive and unbiased examination of the interactions of the previous administration with Native American tribes. A essential strategy is crucial for understanding the complexities concerned.
Tip 1: Examine Treaty Rights: Start by understanding the particular treaty rights held by the tribes affected by explicit insurance policies. Treaties kind the authorized foundation for a lot of tribal claims and outline the obligations of the U.S. authorities. As an example, analyze whether or not a coverage resolution immediately violates a particular treaty provision concerning land use or useful resource administration.
Tip 2: Analyze Environmental Impression Assessments: Scrutinize the environmental affect assessments (EIAs) carried out for tasks affecting tribal lands. Decide whether or not the EIAs adequately thought of tribal considerations, integrated conventional ecological information, and addressed potential impacts on culturally vital websites. The Dakota Entry Pipeline serves as a outstanding instance the place the adequacy of the EIA was closely contested.
Tip 3: Consider Tribal Session Processes: Look at the extent to which tribal governments have been consulted through the growth and implementation of insurance policies. Significant session requires early engagement, provision of sufficient data, and real consideration of tribal views. A mere notification of a choice doesn’t represent significant session.
Tip 4: Monitor Federal Funding Allocations: Analyze funding allocations for packages serving Native American communities, reminiscent of healthcare, schooling, and housing. Determine any adjustments in funding ranges and assess the potential affect on tribal self-sufficiency and well-being. Evaluate funding ranges earlier than, throughout, and after the interval below examination.
Tip 5: Examine Federal Recognition Choices: Overview choices associated to federal recognition of tribes, as recognition confers sure rights and privileges. Assess whether or not the selections have been primarily based on established standards and authorized precedents, and whether or not the method was clear and equitable. Take into account the potential long-term penalties of recognition choices on tribal governance and entry to assets.
Tip 6: Doc Financial Growth Initiatives: Analysis any financial growth initiatives undertaken on tribal lands and assess their effectiveness in creating sustainable financial alternatives. Take into account the extent to which these initiatives aligned with tribal priorities and promoted tribal self-determination, fairly than merely extracting assets or imposing exterior fashions.
Tip 7: Assess Impression on Cultural Assets: Consider the affect of insurance policies and tasks on Native American cultural assets, together with sacred websites, archaeological websites, and conventional cultural properties. Decide whether or not sufficient measures have been taken to guard these assets and whether or not tribal considerations have been addressed in a culturally delicate method.
Thorough adherence to those tips ensures a strong and goal evaluation, offering a clearer understanding of the subject material and its implications.
The next and concluding part presents a listing of additional assets and citations that may facilitate in-depth examination of the multifaceted points raised.
donald trump native people
This exploration has illuminated the multifaceted relationship between the previous president and indigenous populations. Key factors embody interactions concerning tribal sovereignty, environmental rules, gaming rights, land rights, federal recognition, financial growth, healthcare entry, and cultural preservation. The insurance policies and actions undertaken had demonstrable impacts on Native American communities, typically producing controversy and authorized challenges.
Continued vigilance and knowledgeable discourse are important to make sure that the rights and pursuits of Native American tribes are revered and upheld. A sustained dedication to understanding the historic context and modern challenges dealing with indigenous populations is important for fostering a extra simply and equitable relationship between the U.S. authorities and Native American nations.
