The interval coinciding with the Trump administration witnessed notable shifts and continuities within the panorama of companies designed for college students with disabilities. Federal coverage and its implementation considerably influenced the tutorial experiences of this susceptible inhabitants. Understanding the nuances of those modifications requires analyzing legislative actions, budgetary allocations, and coverage interpretations that formed the supply of individualized assist and assets to college students with various studying wants.
The People with Disabilities Schooling Act (IDEA), a cornerstone of making certain entry to free and applicable public training for youngsters with disabilities, remained a central focus. Monitoring the efficient enforcement of IDEA mandates, together with individualized education schemes (IEPs) and procedural safeguards, was crucial. The administration’s strategy to funding allocations for particular training grants and applications, in addition to its emphasis on accountability measures for colleges, had direct implications for the assets out there to assist college students’ educational and developmental progress. Traditionally, federal involvement in particular training has aimed to equalize alternatives, and assessing the extent to which these targets had been superior or hindered throughout this era is crucial.
The next sections will discover particular points of insurance policies and initiatives referring to college students with disabilities throughout this presidential time period, together with modifications in funding fashions, enforcement of civil rights protections, and modern approaches to inclusive training practices inside the broader context of academic reform.
1. IDEA Enforcement
Enforcement of the People with Disabilities Schooling Act (IDEA) throughout the Trump administration constituted a vital determinant of the tutorial experiences of scholars with disabilities. IDEA, a federal regulation, mandates a free applicable public training (FAPE) for eligible kids with disabilities all through the nation, governing how states and public companies present early intervention, particular training, and associated companies. Vigorous enforcement of IDEA necessitates constant monitoring and oversight of state and native academic companies to make sure compliance with its provisions, together with the event and implementation of individualized education schemes (IEPs), procedural safeguards for fogeys, and entry to dispute decision mechanisms. Weakened enforcement can straight end result within the denial of applicable companies and academic alternatives for college students with disabilities.
Throughout this era, oversight actions included the Workplace of Particular Schooling Applications (OSEP) inside the Division of Schooling conducting compliance opinions and investigations of state academic companies (SEAs). OSEP issued steerage and technical help to SEAs and native academic companies (LEAs) relating to IDEA implementation. Enforcement actions may embody corrective motion plans, required programmatic modifications, and withholding of federal funds in circumstances of serious noncompliance. For example, situations of extended and systemic failures to offer IEP companies in particular districts prompted federal intervention via compliance agreements and mandated remedial measures. The impression of budgetary constraints and shifts in coverage priorities inside the Division of Schooling exerted affect on the depth and scope of those enforcement efforts, creating variations within the experiences of scholars and households throughout completely different states and localities.
In conclusion, the diploma to which IDEA’s mandates had been actively enforced served as a crucial indicator of the administration’s dedication to defending the rights and academic wants of scholars with disabilities. Variations in enforcement ranges, pushed by useful resource allocation, coverage emphases, and administrative priorities, straight formed the accessibility and high quality of particular training companies nationwide. Understanding the particular enforcement actions undertaken and their impression is crucial for evaluating the general effectiveness of particular training insurance policies throughout this era and for advocating for continued safety of the rights of scholars with disabilities.
2. Funding Allocations
Funding allocations characterize a crucial side of particular training, straight impacting the supply and high quality of companies offered to college students with disabilities. Throughout the Trump administration, shifts and continuities in federal funding insurance policies considerably influenced the assets accessible to varsities and districts for implementing mandated particular education schemes. Understanding the specifics of those allocations is crucial for evaluating the general impression on college students with particular wants.
-
Federal Grants to States
A considerable portion of federal funding for particular training is distributed to states via grants licensed beneath the People with Disabilities Schooling Act (IDEA). These grants are supposed to help states in offering a free applicable public training (FAPE) to eligible kids with disabilities. Fluctuations within the ranges of federal funding allotted to those grants had a direct impact on states’ capability to assist particular education schemes. For instance, constant underfunding of the federal dedication to IDEA, the place the federal authorities covers a smaller share than initially promised, positioned monetary pressure on state and native budgets, probably resulting in cuts in companies or elevated class sizes.
-
Discretionary Grants and Applications
Along with system grants, the federal authorities additionally helps quite a lot of discretionary grant applications aimed toward enhancing particular training outcomes and selling modern practices. These applications typically goal particular areas, akin to early intervention, assistive expertise, or personnel preparation. Adjustments within the allocation of funding for these discretionary grants throughout the Trump administration affected the supply of focused assist and assets for particular populations of scholars with disabilities. A discount in funding for trainer coaching applications, for example, may exacerbate current trainer shortages in particular training.
-
Medicaid Reimbursement
Medicaid serves as a big supply of funding for sure health-related companies offered to college students with disabilities in colleges, akin to occupational remedy, bodily remedy, and speech remedy. Adjustments in Medicaid insurance policies and reimbursement charges beneath the Trump administration had implications for the extent to which colleges may entry Medicaid funding to assist these important companies. Elevated restrictions on Medicaid eligibility or lowered reimbursement charges may restrict entry to essential therapies for college students with disabilities.
-
College Alternative and Voucher Applications
The growth of faculty alternative applications, together with voucher initiatives, beneath the Trump administration raised considerations concerning the potential impression on funding for public particular education schemes. If college students with disabilities make the most of vouchers to attend personal colleges, public colleges could expertise a discount in funding, probably impacting their skill to offer complete particular training companies. Conversely, personal colleges accepting vouchers might not be geared up or required to offer the identical stage of particular training companies as public colleges.
These sides of funding allocations illustrate the advanced relationship between federal insurance policies and the assets out there to assist college students with disabilities. Adjustments in federal funding ranges, grant priorities, Medicaid insurance policies, and college alternative initiatives straight influenced the capability of states and native academic companies to offer complete and efficient particular training companies. Evaluating the cumulative impression of those shifts is essential for understanding the tutorial experiences of scholars with disabilities throughout this era and for informing future coverage selections associated to particular training funding.
3. Accountability Measures
Accountability measures inside the context of particular training throughout the Trump administration characterize a fancy and sometimes contentious space. These measures, usually carried out to evaluate scholar progress and college efficiency, can have important ramifications for college students with disabilities and the applications designed to serve them. The administration’s emphasis on data-driven decision-making and college alternative initiatives intensified scrutiny on outcomes for college students with disabilities, probably resulting in each constructive and unfavourable penalties. For instance, elevated strain on colleges to display improved standardized check scores may inadvertently incentivize practices that prioritize check preparation over individualized instruction, probably disadvantaging college students with important studying variations. Conversely, the give attention to information could have spurred enhancements in information assortment and evaluation, permitting for extra knowledgeable selections about useful resource allocation and program design. The effectiveness of accountability measures in actually reflecting the progress and desires of scholars with disabilities stays a central query.
The implementation of the Each Scholar Succeeds Act (ESSA), which continued throughout this era, offered states with appreciable flexibility in designing their accountability techniques. This flexibility introduced each alternatives and challenges for particular training. States may probably develop extra nuanced accountability measures that higher mirror the distinctive wants and progress of scholars with disabilities. Nevertheless, this flexibility additionally opened the door to inconsistencies in how states evaluated particular education schemes and the outcomes of scholars with disabilities, probably resulting in disparities in entry to high quality training. For example, some states could have chosen to give attention to commencement charges as a main accountability measure, whereas others prioritized progress on IEP targets. Such variations may have considerably influenced the assets and assist offered to college students with disabilities in several states. The impact of those various approaches requires continued investigation to determine greatest practices.
In conclusion, the impression of accountability measures on particular training throughout this time hinges on the alignment of those measures with the ideas of individualized training and equitable entry. Whereas elevated accountability can drive enhancements in information assortment and program analysis, it additionally carries the danger of incentivizing practices that undermine the individualized assist and companies essential for college students with disabilities to thrive. Future analysis and coverage improvement should give attention to creating accountability techniques that precisely mirror the progress and desires of scholars with disabilities, promote equitable entry to high quality training, and assist the continued enchancment of particular education schemes. The problem lies in placing a steadiness between holding colleges accountable and making certain that accountability measures don’t inadvertently drawback the very college students they’re supposed to serve.
4. College Alternative Impression
The growth of faculty alternative initiatives throughout the Trump administration had demonstrable results on particular training. These initiatives, encompassing voucher applications, tax-credit scholarships, and constitution faculty development, altered the tutorial panorama for college students with disabilities. A central concern lies within the potential for these applications to divert assets from public colleges, which historically shoulder the first accountability for offering particular training companies. This useful resource reallocation can create monetary pressures on public faculty districts, probably diminishing the standard and availability of specialised applications and assist companies. For instance, if a big variety of college students with disabilities make the most of vouchers to attend personal colleges, the corresponding discount in public faculty funding could result in bigger class sizes, fewer specialised personnel (akin to therapists and particular training academics), and a diminished capability to offer individualized education schemes (IEPs) that absolutely meet scholar wants. Conversely, proponents argue that faculty alternative empowers dad and mom to pick academic settings higher suited to their kid’s wants, together with these with disabilities. The crux of the matter lies in whether or not personal colleges or constitution colleges taking part in these applications are adequately geared up and legally obligated to offer the identical stage of particular training companies as public colleges, as mandated by the People with Disabilities Schooling Act (IDEA).
The implications of faculty alternative for college students with disabilities are multifaceted and sometimes rely upon the particular traits of every program and the rules governing taking part colleges. Some personal colleges could lack the specialised experience or assets essential to implement IEPs successfully, whereas others could selectively enroll college students, excluding these with extra extreme disabilities or these requiring intensive assist. This selective enrollment, sometimes called “cream-skimming,” can additional focus college students with advanced wants in public colleges, exacerbating useful resource constraints. Moreover, the authorized framework governing particular training companies in personal colleges taking part in voucher applications is commonly much less stringent than IDEA necessities, probably leaving college students with disabilities with out the identical stage of authorized safety and due course of rights. A sensible instance could be a guardian struggling to acquire essential lodging for his or her youngster with a studying incapacity in a personal faculty that doesn’t absolutely adhere to IDEA tips, resulting in a protracted dispute and a possible denial of applicable academic companies.
In abstract, the impression of faculty alternative on particular training throughout this era was characterised by a fancy interaction of things, together with useful resource allocation, regulatory oversight, and parental empowerment. Whereas faculty alternative provided some households elevated academic choices, it additionally raised considerations concerning the potential for lowered funding for public particular education schemes and disparities within the high quality and availability of companies. Making certain equitable entry to high-quality particular training companies inside the context of faculty alternative requires cautious consideration of funding mechanisms, regulatory frameworks, and accountability measures to safeguard the rights and desires of scholars with disabilities. The long-term results of those coverage modifications on the tutorial outcomes of scholars with disabilities warrant continued monitoring and analysis to tell evidence-based coverage selections.
5. Civil Rights Protections
The intersection of civil rights protections and particular training throughout the Trump administration presents a fancy narrative of each continuity and potential challenges. Federal legal guidelines, most notably the People with Disabilities Schooling Act (IDEA) and Part 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, present essential safeguards making certain college students with disabilities obtain a free applicable public training (FAPE) and should not discriminated towards based mostly on their incapacity. The constant enforcement of those protections is paramount to guaranteeing equitable entry to academic alternatives. Any perceived weakening or alteration of enforcement mechanisms had the potential to disproportionately have an effect on this susceptible scholar inhabitants. For instance, lowered funding for the Workplace for Civil Rights (OCR) inside the Division of Schooling may hinder its skill to research complaints of discrimination successfully, thereby leaving college students with disabilities with out recourse when their rights are violated. Cases the place colleges failed to offer essential lodging, akin to assistive expertise or accessible studying supplies, may go unaddressed, perpetuating inequities.
Throughout this era, the Division of Schooling’s stance on sure points, such because the rights of transgender college students with disabilities, additionally raised considerations amongst advocates. Steering issued by the Obama administration clarifying that Title IX protects transgender college students from discrimination was rescinded, creating uncertainty relating to the civil rights protections afforded to those college students. This coverage shift had direct relevance to college students with disabilities who additionally determine as transgender, probably rising their vulnerability to harassment and discrimination in colleges. An actual-life instance would contain a transgender scholar with autism being denied entry to the suitable restroom amenities, making a hostile studying setting and hindering their skill to take part absolutely at school actions. Furthermore, the emphasis on native management and deregulation, whereas supposed to empower states and districts, may inadvertently result in inconsistencies within the implementation of civil rights protections for college students with disabilities throughout completely different jurisdictions.
In conclusion, the safeguarding of civil rights protections for college students with disabilities throughout the Trump administration remained a crucial space of concern. Whereas the elemental authorized framework remained in place, shifts in coverage priorities, enforcement mechanisms, and interpretations of current legal guidelines had the potential to erode the protections afforded to this susceptible inhabitants. Making certain that college students with disabilities have equal entry to academic alternatives requires steady vigilance, sturdy enforcement of civil rights legal guidelines, and a dedication to creating inclusive and supportive studying environments for all. The effectiveness of those protections served as a significant indicator of the administration’s dedication to upholding the rights of scholars with disabilities and selling equitable academic outcomes.
6. Inclusive Practices
The implementation and promotion of inclusive practices inside particular training confronted a fancy panorama throughout the Trump administration. Whereas the precept of inclusive training educating college students with disabilities alongside their non-disabled friends to the best extent applicable remained a core tenet of the People with Disabilities Schooling Act (IDEA), the sensible utility and assist for this precept had been influenced by broader coverage shifts. For example, an elevated emphasis on native management in training may result in variations in how inclusive practices had been carried out throughout completely different states and districts. Some districts may actively embrace and increase inclusive fashions, offering essential assets and coaching to assist each college students with disabilities and their normal training academics. Nevertheless, others may prioritize conventional, segregated particular training settings attributable to budgetary constraints or a lack of knowledge relating to the advantages of inclusive training. The absence of robust federal mandates or incentives selling inclusive practices may contribute to inconsistent implementation and probably restrict alternatives for college students with disabilities to be taught in built-in settings. A sensible instance might be noticed in districts that lowered funding for co-teaching fashions (the place particular training and normal training academics collectively instruct a category), resulting in elevated reliance on pull-out applications that take away college students with disabilities from the final training classroom.
The impression of faculty alternative initiatives on inclusive practices additionally warrants consideration. Whereas faculty alternative applications theoretically supply dad and mom elevated academic choices, the power of personal colleges and constitution colleges to successfully implement inclusive practices and accommodate college students with various studying wants different considerably. Some personal colleges may lack the assets or experience essential to offer the identical stage of assist as public colleges, probably resulting in college students with disabilities being underserved or excluded from sure actions. Moreover, the standards for enrolling college students in personal colleges may inadvertently discriminate towards college students with extra extreme disabilities or these requiring intensive assist. A concrete illustration might be a personal faculty declining to confess a scholar with important behavioral challenges, successfully denying them entry to an inclusive academic setting. The supply of assistive expertise, specialised therapies, and skilled particular training workers typically differed significantly between private and non-private colleges, impacting the general high quality of inclusive training for college students with disabilities taking part at school alternative applications.
In conclusion, the promotion of inclusive practices inside particular training throughout this era was formed by a mixture of federal coverage steerage, state and native implementation efforts, and the broader context of academic reform. Whereas IDEA continued to mandate the supply of FAPE within the least restrictive setting, the extent to which this mandate translated into widespread adoption of inclusive practices different considerably. Challenges included inconsistent funding for inclusive initiatives, various ranges of assist for normal training academics, and potential disparities within the high quality of companies out there in several academic settings. Transferring ahead, a renewed give attention to offering complete coaching for academics, allocating ample assets to assist inclusive school rooms, and making certain constant oversight of all colleges taking part at school alternative applications shall be important to selling equitable and inclusive academic alternatives for all college students with disabilities.
7. Instructor Coaching
Instructor coaching serves as a foundational ingredient within the provision of efficient particular training companies. The standard and availability of adequately skilled particular training academics straight affect the tutorial and developmental outcomes of scholars with disabilities. Analyzing trainer coaching initiatives throughout the Trump administration necessitates an understanding of federal insurance policies, funding priorities, and their impression on the preparation {and professional} improvement of particular training personnel.
-
Federal Funding for Instructor Preparation
Federal funding performs a vital position in supporting trainer preparation applications, together with these targeted on particular training. Any shifts in federal funding priorities throughout this era straight impacted the capability of universities and faculties to supply sturdy particular training coaching applications. For instance, reductions in federal grants aimed toward supporting trainer residencies or mortgage forgiveness applications may exacerbate current trainer shortages in particular training, significantly in high-need areas. The results of underfunding trainer preparation embody a diminished pool of certified particular training academics, elevated reliance on alternatively licensed personnel, and probably decrease high quality instruction for college students with disabilities.
-
Emphasis on Proof-Primarily based Practices
The promotion and dissemination of evidence-based practices in particular training are contingent upon efficient trainer coaching. Instructor preparation applications should equip aspiring particular training academics with the data and expertise essential to implement research-backed interventions and techniques. Federal initiatives, such because the Institute of Schooling Sciences (IES), play a big position in supporting analysis on efficient instructing practices. The extent to which trainer coaching applications built-in these evidence-based practices throughout this era straight influenced the power of particular training academics to enhance scholar outcomes. For instance, applications that emphasised express instruction, systematic prompting, and data-based decision-making had been extra more likely to produce academics who may successfully tackle the varied studying wants of their college students.
-
Skilled Growth Alternatives
Ongoing skilled improvement is crucial for making certain that particular training academics stay present on greatest practices and might successfully tackle the evolving wants of their college students. Adjustments in federal funding or state-level insurance policies relating to skilled improvement had a direct impression on the supply {of professional} studying alternatives for particular training academics. A discount in funding for skilled improvement may restrict entry to workshops, conferences, and mentoring applications, probably hindering academics’ skill to enhance their expertise and data. For instance, academics may be much less capable of study new assistive applied sciences or evidence-based interventions for college students with autism, in the end impacting their skill to offer efficient instruction.
-
Instructor Shortages and Retention
Instructor shortages in particular training have been a persistent problem. The Trump administration’s insurance policies, both straight or not directly, influenced the recruitment and retention of particular training academics. Elements akin to trainer salaries, working circumstances, and entry to assist companies all contribute to trainer retention charges. Insurance policies that negatively impression these elements, akin to funds cuts or elevated accountability pressures, may exacerbate trainer shortages, resulting in bigger class sizes, elevated trainer burnout, and probably decrease high quality instruction for college students with disabilities. Conversely, initiatives that assist trainer well-being, present alternatives for skilled development, and supply aggressive salaries may assist to draw and retain certified particular training academics.
The varied sides of trainer coaching mentioned spotlight the intricate connection between federal insurance policies and the standard of particular training companies. Satisfactory funding, emphasis on evidence-based practices, skilled improvement alternatives, and techniques to fight trainer shortages all play very important roles in making certain that college students with disabilities obtain efficient instruction from certified particular training academics. Evaluating these elements offers perception into the general panorama of particular training throughout the Trump administration and underscores the significance of investing in trainer coaching to enhance outcomes for college students with disabilities.
Often Requested Questions
The next questions tackle frequent inquiries relating to particular training insurance policies and their implementation throughout the Trump administration. These solutions intention to offer a factual and unbiased overview.
Query 1: Did federal funding for particular training improve or lower throughout this era?
Federal funding for particular training, primarily distributed via People with Disabilities Schooling Act (IDEA) grants to states, skilled fluctuations. Whereas general appropriations could have proven incremental will increase in some years, the federal authorities constantly failed to fulfill its unique dedication to totally fund IDEA, putting a better monetary burden on states and native academic companies.
Query 2: Have been there important modifications to IDEA throughout this administration?
No substantial legislative modifications had been made to IDEA itself. Nevertheless, interpretations and enforcement of current rules, together with shifts in coverage priorities inside the Division of Schooling, not directly impacted how IDEA was carried out on the state and native ranges.
Query 3: How did faculty alternative initiatives have an effect on particular training?
The growth of faculty alternative applications, together with vouchers and tax-credit scholarships, launched complexities. Whereas proponents argued for elevated parental alternative, considerations arose relating to the capability of personal colleges to offer comparable particular training companies as mandated by IDEA, probably diverting assets from public colleges.
Query 4: What was the administration’s stance on inclusive training practices?
Whereas the administration didn’t explicitly oppose inclusive training, the emphasis on native management and deregulation created variations in how inclusive practices had been carried out throughout completely different states and districts. The absence of robust federal mandates selling inclusion probably restricted alternatives for college students with disabilities to be taught in built-in settings.
Query 5: Have been civil rights protections for college students with disabilities maintained?
The basic authorized framework safeguarding civil rights for college students with disabilities remained in place. Nevertheless, coverage shifts, such because the rescission of steerage relating to the rights of transgender college students, raised considerations amongst advocates relating to the potential erosion of those protections for susceptible scholar populations.
Query 6: Did the administration tackle the trainer scarcity in particular training?
The administration’s insurance policies had an oblique impression on trainer recruitment and retention. Elements akin to trainer salaries, working circumstances, and entry to assist companies all influenced trainer provide. Federal funding for trainer preparation applications skilled some fluctuations, probably exacerbating current trainer shortages in high-need areas.
This FAQ offers a concise overview of crucial points of particular training throughout this particular timeframe. Additional investigation into particular insurance policies and their implementation is advisable for a extra complete understanding.
The next part offers assets for additional studying.
Navigating Particular Schooling
The interval beneath dialogue provided crucial insights into safeguarding the rights and desires of scholars with disabilities. These classes realized function beneficial steerage for future coverage and advocacy efforts.
Tip 1: Vigilant Monitoring of IDEA Enforcement: Persistent oversight of the People with Disabilities Schooling Act (IDEA) is paramount. Any laxity in implementing IDEA mandates can straight compromise college students’ entry to a free applicable public training. States and native academic companies require constant monitoring to make sure compliance with IEP provisions and procedural safeguards.
Tip 2: Prioritize Satisfactory Federal Funding: Advocate for constant and ample federal funding for particular education schemes. Underfunding IDEA locations undue pressure on state and native budgets, probably resulting in diminished companies and compromised academic alternatives. The federal authorities should fulfill its dedication to cowl a good portion of particular training prices.
Tip 3: Scrutinize College Alternative Program Impression: Fastidiously assess the consequences of faculty alternative initiatives on college students with disabilities. Be sure that personal colleges taking part in voucher applications are adequately geared up and legally obligated to offer comparable particular training companies. Monitor for selective enrollment practices that would drawback college students with advanced wants.
Tip 4: Strengthen Civil Rights Protections: Keep a robust stance towards any erosion of civil rights protections for college students with disabilities. Vigorous enforcement of Part 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and Title II of the People with Disabilities Act is crucial to forestall discrimination and guarantee equal entry to academic alternatives. Carefully monitor coverage modifications that would disproportionately have an effect on susceptible scholar populations, akin to transgender college students with disabilities.
Tip 5: Promote Proof-Primarily based Inclusive Practices: Champion the adoption of evidence-based inclusive practices that combine college students with disabilities into normal training settings to the best extent applicable. Present complete coaching and assist for each particular training and normal training academics to successfully implement inclusive fashions.
Tip 6: Put money into Instructor Coaching and Assist: Deal with the persistent trainer scarcity in particular training via focused recruitment and retention efforts. Put money into sturdy trainer preparation applications and supply ongoing skilled improvement alternatives to make sure that particular training academics are well-equipped to fulfill the varied wants of their college students.
Tip 7: Knowledge-Pushed Determination Making with Warning: Emphasize the significance of data-driven decision-making in particular training. Nevertheless, it’s crucial to make sure that accountability measures precisely mirror the progress and desires of scholars with disabilities. Promote accountability techniques that worth individualized instruction and equitable entry, quite than solely specializing in standardized check scores.
The following tips spotlight the necessity for proactive measures to guard the rights and desires of scholars with disabilities. Steady monitoring, advocacy, and a dedication to equitable entry are important for making certain constructive academic outcomes.
The teachings gleaned from this era underscore the significance of steady vigilance and advocacy for insurance policies that promote equitable entry to high-quality particular training companies. The conclusion presents closing ideas and a name to motion.
Conclusion
The previous evaluation of particular training beneath the Trump administration reveals a interval marked by each continuities and important shifts in coverage and apply. Whereas foundational legal guidelines akin to IDEA remained in place, changes to funding allocations, enforcement priorities, and interpretations of current rules considerably formed the tutorial experiences of scholars with disabilities. Emphasis on native management, growth of faculty alternative applications, and evolving civil rights protections generated a fancy panorama requiring cautious scrutiny. The impression on inclusive practices, trainer coaching, and general entry to equitable academic alternatives necessitates additional analysis to totally perceive the long-term penalties.
The insights gained from this era function a vital reminder of the continued want for vigilant advocacy and proactive insurance policies that safeguard the rights and desires of scholars with disabilities. It stays crucial that future efforts prioritize equitable funding, sturdy enforcement of civil rights protections, and evidence-based practices to make sure that all college students with disabilities have entry to a high-quality training that empowers them to achieve their full potential.
