The presidential motion, initiated in 2017 and expanded upon subsequently, restricted entry into america for nationals of a number of nations. Initially targeted on a smaller group of predominantly Muslim-majority nations, it was later broadened to incorporate different nations with various justifications cited, reminiscent of nationwide safety considerations or insufficient information-sharing protocols. The exact listing of affected nations and the particular restrictions imposed advanced over time as a consequence of authorized challenges and revisions.
The measure sparked important controversy and debate, elevating questions on its legality, constitutionality, and impression on worldwide relations. Proponents argued its necessity for safeguarding nationwide safety and guaranteeing correct vetting procedures for overseas nationals. Opponents contended that it discriminated in opposition to particular non secular and ethnic teams, broken America’s repute as a welcoming nation, and harmed households and people searching for to journey to or immigrate to america. Its implementation resulted in widespread disruption and uncertainty for vacationers, immigrants, and companies.
