The expression denotes a sentiment of higher confidence or reliance on various entities, ideas, or objects in comparison with a selected particular person. For instance, one would possibly assert a higher belief in established scientific consensus than in assertions made by the person in query.
This type of comparability serves to spotlight perceived deficiencies within the trustworthiness of the person being referenced. Its prevalence usually displays broader societal considerations concerning credibility, transparency, and moral conduct in management and decision-making. Historic cases of comparable comparative statements may be present in political discourse and public commentary, usually used to critique figures perceived as missing integrity.
