The phrasing describes a perceived energy dynamic between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, suggesting that one chief exerted important management or affect over the opposite. It is a metaphor implying subservience, the place one social gathering’s actions and selections are dictated by one other.
This interpretation carries substantial weight because of its implications for worldwide relations and nationwide safety. The concept a overseas chief might manipulate or management the actions of a U.S. president raises issues about compromised sovereignty and potential vulnerabilities in overseas coverage decision-making. Historic context would contain analyzing particular situations of interplay between the 2 leaders to judge the validity and extent of any potential affect.
