The time period “segregation ban,” when referring to actions taken throughout the Trump administration, mostly factors to the rescinding of honest housing rules designed to fight discriminatory housing practices. These rules, applied below the Obama administration, aimed to handle disparate affect, the place insurance policies that seem impartial on the floor can have discriminatory results on protected teams. As an illustration, a landlord’s strict “no legal document” coverage might disproportionately have an effect on minority candidates who could have larger charges of arrest as a consequence of historic and systemic biases within the legal justice system.
These honest housing guidelines have been seen as vital instruments for guaranteeing equal entry to housing and stopping refined types of discrimination that usually perpetuate segregation. Advocates argued that they supplied a mechanism to problem insurance policies and practices that, whereas not explicitly discriminatory, had the impact of denying housing alternatives primarily based on race, ethnicity, or different protected traits. Traditionally, such rules have been essential in dismantling discriminatory practices that contribute to residential segregation and restrict entry to alternatives for marginalized communities.
